Cancerfighter’s Weblog

Alternative cancer therapies and ideas

Posts Tagged ‘cancer information’

The Doc Says: “You’ve Got Cancer!” – So Now What?

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on April 30, 2014


The Doc Says: “You’ve Got Cancer!” – So Now What?
Imagine this scenario. You’re in the doctor’s clinic and he says to you: “I’m afraid the news is bad. You have cancer.”
What do you do now?
I imagine some of you will say to yourself: This is the worst news I could ever have. I had been hoping I would never hear those words. Now what do I do? Am I going to die?
You will feel devastated, terrified and lost
So, you will very likely respond by clutching to what seems to be the smart thing – to go ahead and do what the doctor advises. Here is a kind of certainty. He knows his job. All you have to do is submit to his judgement. Above all you don’t have to keep swimming in this sea of uncertainty.
Now, maybe that is the smart thing to do – or maybe it isn’t. But right now you don’t know. You do know that there are a lot of different ideas flying around – but what those ideas are you haven’t a clue. You also know there are lots of books – so presumably there are things to discuss. If all you had to do was follow the doctor’s suggestions why the need for all these books?
So some others of you will say to yourselves: OK. I guess I’d better go and educate myself about this cancer thing. But where do I start? [hint: read my book The Cancer Survivor’s Bible!]
But fast as you read you will feel you are on a treadmill that is constantly speeding up. Everything seems to be going faster than you can go – and much as you want to read and learn, your brain seems frozen with a kind of nauseous panic.
So what can you do?
Well your options at this stage are either to go ahead and do everything the doctor says or to hide away for a month or two with a stack of books and access to the internet and worry that the delay is going to have negative consequences.
Let’s pause here
So let me press the pause button on this and instead of asking you: What do you do now? Let me ask you instead:
What can you do now so that you can avoid being in this situation in the future?
Around one in two people are going to have this “You’ve got cancer” conversation with the doctor. If you value your life and well-being, it makes sense to be prepared now when you don’t appear to have cancer. You aren’t frozen by fear. Your mind is free to think things through in a relaxed manner. If you don’t prepare yourself then at some point in the future you will suddenly be saying to yourself: I wish I knew more about cancer.
Yes, now is the time to do the reading. Now is the time to say: OK if I get cancer this is what I am going to do. That will be my strategy. So when the time comes the conversation with the doctor will go like this.
Doctor: “I’m afraid the news is bad. You have clear signs of cancer.”
You: “OK. Doc. I’ve been expecting that for some time. So, this is what I want to do…”
And you will be wonderfully empowered by being in control.
Of course, we will all want to do different things because we are different people and will have different cancers. But the best decisions – whatever the decisions might be – are based on a clear understanding of the situation and the options.
Just taking the time now to inform yourself could add years to your life and could help you avoid fear, pain and life-long damage. Your fate is in your own hands but you’ve got to act now.
I know what I will do when I am diagnosed. Do you?
© Jonathan Chamberlain 2014

Jonathan Chamberlain is author of The Cancer Survivor’s Bible and Cancer? Don’t Panic! (free download from his website at www.fightingcancer.com

Advertisements

Posted in articles | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Cancer? Don’t Panic – book (free download)

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on November 29, 2013


Cancer? Don’t Panic! is the title of a short book I have written designed to help people question the values and attitudes they bring to the subject – and which can get in the way of recovery. This book is available as a paperback or Kindle – or as a freely downloadable 84 page book whch touches lightly on a number of themes that people diagnosed with cancer should be aware of. You can download it from www.fightingcancer.com

It was previously published as Fifty Shades of Cancer and then as Sixty Shades of Cancer – all of these books have been replaced by Cancer? Don’t Panic.
cancer_dont_panic - Kindle

Posted in Cancer Perspectives, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Fifty Shades of Cancer – update

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on August 12, 2013


fiftyshadesofcancer - Kindle
Having uploaded my Fifty Shades of Cancer to Kindle and Kobo I suddenly realised that I had a few important insights that I hadn’t included that really needed to be included and that some of the others could be shuffled to one side to make room, So, for those who have already bought the book here are the bits that I have added in. And for those who haven’t here is a taster of what’s in the book.

43. Is evidence-based medicine all it seems?
Doctors use the phrase ‘evidence-based medicine’ to define what they do. There is a clear inference here that everything that they do is supported by strong evidence and everything they reject is unsupported by such evidence. But this is not true.
This subject is extraordinarily complicated – too complex to discuss in a few short paragraphs (I have given a lengthy discussion of this in The Cancer Survivor’s Bible) but among the issues that are raised is the question of anecdotal evidence and what credence we should give to it. Anecdotal evidence is evidence based on what someone else has reported. “I heard of someone who…” There is also the issue of what credence we should give to our own direct experience.
Now, I have seen news reports that announce that ‘research proves that vitamin C does not cure colds’. I have also twice had the experience of feeling a flu come on and immediately I have started throwing vitamin C down my throat at a rate of one gram per hour – actually two or three 1,000mg tablets every two-to-three hours – and by the following morning I have been right as rain, completely clear headed (despite a few hours earlier feeling completely bunged up). So should I listen to the newspapers or to my own direct experience?
I think you can guess the answer. Among my friends I am known as Mr Vitamin C. Whatever the problem I am likely to recommend (among other things) large doses of vitamin C. One friend of mine once complained of the heavy cold she had so I went into my mantra.
“But I’m already taking large doses of vitamin C,” she said. “I take one of those big tablets every day.”
“Every hour,” I said.
“Every hour?” I could see the shock in her eyes.
“You can’t overdose,” I explained.
A week later she said to me: “I did what you said and I could just feel the cold going away.”
OK. Where have we come? The problem is this. I have direct experience of the power of vitamin C (and no it is not that I am susceptible to the placebo response) so I am happy to disbelieve any attempts to rubbish it. My friend did not have direct experience but she decided I was a good source of information, so on my say-so she increased her intake. Now let us suppose that she had told a friend of hers “My friend Jonathan says to take lots of vitamin C” – then the friend of the friend is more remote from the source of information so he or she will have less confidence in the truth (and indeed the information may have become tainted in some way) – so this is one reason that anecdotal evidence needs to be treated with some caution.
However…
Doctors and scientists frame the issue as one of ‘truth’. What is the truth about vitamin C, for example? In that case, it is perfectly reasonable to be suspicious, as they are, of anecdotal reports. That doesn’t mean these anecdotes are useless. It just means they are low-level evidence. But as we have seen anecdotes are not equal in their evidential force. The closer we are to the person who is telling the story, the more we know about the person, the stronger the evidence becomes because we will tend to trust the source more. That is why
But for the patient who has to make a decision the issue is not: Is it true or not true? The issue is: Should I do this or not do this? It is a decision-making issue, not a true-false issue,
Why does this make a difference?
We accept that there is a great deal of uncertainty in our lives. We accept that a book or film or restaurant may be disappointing despite being enthusiastically recommended by a friend. We accept that there is risk in deciding to marry this person or that – but there is also a benefit. We have to balance the risk against the benefit.
So, it is perfectly reasonable to take vitamin C for your cold, for example, on the principle of ‘suck it and see’. Just do it and see if it works. If it does, that’s good and if it doesn’t well at least you tried and now you know.
When we approach it in this way we do not require absolute proof that it is effective, we just require that there is some reasonable possibility of this based on some evidence no matter how flimsy. Obviously, if we are wise, we will balance this consideration against the possible pain and damage that might result. Or the cost involved.
In the case of vitamin C there are no down-sides. Vitamin C will not in any way, at any dose, be harmful, certainly not in the short term, and as for cost, it is very cheap. A big potential plus against a non-existent minus. So this is a no-brainer. (Note: when I talk of vitamin C I am NOT talking about those fizzy orange tablets but ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate powder that I get from a major online supplements supermarket in the States – there are a number of these. (I use iherb.com.)
Chemotherapy however offers a different equation. It might offer in the case of testicular cancer a 96% possibility of cure (the positive) against a great deal of pain and damage (the negative) or it might offer – as low as a 2.5% possibility of cure (as my wife was quoted) but it requires the sale of your house to pay for it as well as a high risk of permanent damage.
Each of us will make different decisions in the face of these facts – and that is as it should be.
So, a true-false question might come up with an answer based on proof. There is no proof that will determine whether a decision is absolutely right or wrong.
By the way, it should be noted here that the general consensus is that 80 per cent of what doctors do is NOT based on strong evidence. There is no evidence, for example, supporting the benefit of being in a hospital (and quite a lot of evidence suggesting that being in a hospital is a health risk on its own) – but this doesn’t stop doctors recommending that very sick people should go to hospital.

Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement. Nothing can be done without hope and confidence.
Helen Keller

44. Anecdotal evidence and placebo cures
The issue of whether anecdotal evidence is useful arouses extreme passions in discussion forums. Some people assume that anecdotal evidence is false evidence, that if someone claims a benefit that is not supported by proof that it is false – either they are lying or they have experienced a placebo cure, which wouldn’t count.
My response to the first claim is to say – try it yourself. See if it works. Anecdotal evidence can be a useful signpost.
My response to the second objection is this: If X produces a benefit to me, and if that benefit is a response to the placebo effect and not to X itself, then give me X not because it is effective but because it will create a placebo effect. Placebo effects are good. If it takes X to trigger this effect then X is good.

I believe a leaf of grass is no less than the journey-work of the stars.
Walt Whitman

45. Evidence-based medicine (part 2)
I want to tell you a story about lavender essential oil. In our house, while the kids were growing up, we called this magic oil. And it is magic. I have often cut myself in the kitchen, often quite deeply with blood gushing out and I have then poured lavender oil liberally over the wound and repeated this over say five to ten minutes. Half an hour later the cut will have completely healed itself and there will be no pain or even sensitivity and nor is there any issue of the wound going septic. This is also true of any burn. The pain will quickly go.
A friend of mine had a large steam burn on his hand that was still open and festering three days later. I poured lavender oil over this wound and within an hour there were clear signs of it healing. Within a week it had scabbed over and dropped off leaving no sign of an injury.
I was directed once to the US National Cancer Institute’s database of herbs and their effects. I looked up lavender and the consensus opinion was that it was not very effective. I emailed them and asked them to do a simple experiment. I asked them to cut themselves and pour lavender oil over the cut and then an hour later to come back to me and say it was not effective. Their reply was that several professors had said that it was not effective so that wording would stay.
Does that sound ‘evidence-based’ to you? Our direct experience is surely the strongest evidence there can be (certainly for ourselves). We know that research can be tinkered with and so we cannot really be sure that what is ‘proved to be true’ really is true – so we have to judge it.
The problem is that we live in an uncertain world. Demanding certainty in this world is bound to lead to disappointment. We just have to assess carefully the evidence from all sources and then make our decision on our own estimation of the risks and costs on the negative side against the benefits on the other.
It was the French philosopher Pascal who came up with the formulation of this by arguing that even if it was 99.99 per cent certain that God did not exist, we still needed to believe in Him because that is the only way to get to heaven (if heaven exists). For Pascal, it was not necessary to have proof of God’s existence before he would agree to believe. I would say the same to those who argue against alternative therapies. Heaven (in this case the possibility of cure without crippling pain and the strong likelihood of long term harm) can only be reached by means of the alternative therapies. But each of us has to make that decision for ourselves.

If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Carl Sagan

46. Evidence-based medicine (part 3)
There is evidence that conventional treatment shortens lives. A medical statistician by the name of Hardin Jones calculated that the average cancer patient was likely to live four times longer if they did nothing for their cancer than if they did something. This conclusion has never been rebutted.

“My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims actually live up to four times longer than treated individuals,” Dr. Hardin B. Jones told MIDNIGHT Magazine.
“For a typical type of cancer, people who refused treatment lived for an average of 12 1/2 years. Those who, accepted surgery and other kinds of treatment lived an average of only three years!
“Beyond a shadow of a doubt, radical surgery on cancer patients does more harm than good.”…He has traveled the world collecting data on the dreaded disease, and presented his findings to the American Cancer Society and medical schools.
Asked why ‘the medical world has ignored his findings, he replied: “Frankly, I don’t know the reasons. But they have probably become caught up in the tidal wave of individuals demanding treatment.” (quoted from http://www.rethinkingcancer.org)

I certainly know that in the case of my wife, she could not have died faster if she had done nothing. So doing nothing for your cancer is a perfectly reasonable strategy.
Scare tactics
However, say this to a doctor and you will get a response like this: “One of my patients refused to do conventional treatments and a year later she died”. And this is very possible. People with cancer do die. But the doctor doesn’t tell you about the patients who have followed his advice to have conventional treatments and have then died. The fact that a patient has died does not invalidate the journey they have travelled whichever way that is.

Sunshine is delicious, rain is refreshing, wind braces us up, snow is exhilarating; there is really no such thing as bad weather, only different kinds of good weather.
John Ruskin

The best thing one can do when it’s raining is to let it rain.
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

47. Just imagine
Just imagine that I announced to the world that I had a new treatment. It would cure something like 5-15% of all cancers but that it would cause immense pain, would seriously damage health and would be extremely expensive. Would such a treatment be welcomed? I think not. But this is the situation today with chemotherapy. If it were a new treatment it would be rejected out of hand but because it is an old established treatment it must be persisted with. Does that make sense?

I can’t change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.
Jimmy Dean

Posted in Cancer Perspectives, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

This Website

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on July 15, 2013


These books will mess with the way you think about cancer
My name is Jonathan Chamberlain and I am the author of a number of books on cancer. The Cancer Survivor’s Bible (550 pages of Facts, Issues and Options); Cancer Recovery Guide – 15 strategies for recovery; Cancer? Don’t Panic (ebook and paperback) – the wisdom of 20 years thinking about cancer summarized into short, highly focused points you will need to think about. It started with 50 points but soon became 60 . There it is. This is a quick intro to help orientate you and mess with the way you think about cancer; and The Amazing Cancer Kid – the story of a boy who has confounded his doctors expectations by not dying 7 years ago. I actually wrote these books for myself. I want to live and I don’t want to have my health damaged and I really don’t want to suffer pain. For further details go to www.fightingcancer.com

Posted in cancer recovery | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

The New Cancer Complete Recovery Guide Series

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on November 29, 2011


My new edition coming out mid December 2011

The Cancer Complete Recovery Guide Series

The Cancer Complete Recovery Guide Series—in eight volumes—is the updated and expanded version of the book Cancer: The Complete Recovery Guide (2008 edition). Based on 18 years of research, which I did in order to discover for myself what I would do if—as my wife did—I ever got cancer. I am sharing this information with you because it could help you live much, much longer and save you a great deal of pain. It is the single most comprehensive discussion of all your cancer recovery options in print anywhere in the world.

Book 1: Cancer? What Now?

Make sure the first steps of your cancer journey are heading in the right direction

This book gives you all the basic cancer facts you need and outlines the four sensible strategies for dealing with cancer—and the arguments supporting them. Everybody approaches cancer differently. In this book I help you focus on the strategy most appropriate to you—and then I give suggestions for resources so that you can continue your journey.

Book 2: Cancer: Diagnosis and Conventional Treatments

The Pros and Cons of Cancer Tests, Surgery, Radiation and Chemotherapy

What are the benefits and drawbacks of conventional diagnostic tests and treatments? This book provides a detailed look at what is available and what the benefits and drawbacks are. Included also are various non-conventional testing options and suggestions as to how you can protect yourself if you wish to proceed with conventional treatment.

Book 3: Cancer: Research and Politics

This book helps you understand the wider context of cancer—why cancer research has not come up with a cure and most likely never will; why the medical profession is unable to recognise the value of herbs and supplements—if a herb or supplement can cure cancer you will never hear about it from the medical profession; and why we should all be worried by the erosion of our health freedoms. You will also learn about the scientists who have bucked the system, and what has happened to them.

Book 4: Cancer: Detox and Diet

Whatever else you decide to do for your cancer you would be wise to undergo a radical change in diet. This book looks at the arguments and options in the area of detoxification and diet. You will also find here a lengthy list of individual foods and their benefits.

Book 5: Cancer: Herbs, Botanicals and Biological Therapies

Many herbs can help in the fight against cancer. Here we look at all the major herbal options. Herbs have many advantages over drugs—but there are also potential dangers. This book explores this world and explains all the issues and options involved. This book also covers homeopathy and other biological therapies.

Book 6: Cancer: Vitamins and Other Supplements

Everyone knows that vitamin C is good for you—but what kind of vitamin C? In what quantities? And what about the other vitamins? The minerals? The other chemicals—both natural and man-made? You will find everything you need to know here.

Book 7: Cancer: Energy, Mind and Emotions

This book covers a wide range of ideas from electrical and magnetic devices, sunlight, energy healing, prayer, exercise and the extraordinary interplay of our physical and emotional lives.

Book 8: Cancer: Survivors’ Stories: They did it. You can too!

The proof is in the pudding. These stories tell how 25 people have reacted to a diagnosis and how they became once again cancer-free. These stories are proof that cancer can be cured with the help of diet, herbs, supplements and many other strategies. Here you will learn what people have done to get well again. There is hope.

You can download a free pdf version of Book 8 at www.fightingcancer.com

Testimonials

Cancer: The Complete Recovery Guide

Cancer: The Complete Recovery Guide is an inspirational guide [and is] a must for anyone who fears the dreadful diagnosis.’—The Midwest Book Review

‘This book gives hope…. It explains clearly the arguments for and against a multitude of treatments…. I wish I’d read this book before I was diagnosed. My doctor and the cancer charities didn’t tell me any of this.’—D Bushell

‘A very well written book, beautifully organised and easy to read and understand.’—June Black, cancer survivor.

‘This book tells me everything I want to know. Why didn’t my doctor tell me this?’—Rev Bill Newbern

‘I want to say how inspirational your book and all its suggestions have been. It has enabled me to keep positive for my sister over the past terrible months.’—Emma Greener

‘I just wanted to say thank you from the bottom of my heart. You gave us hope when all we could see was despair and you gave us a path when we thought all was lost.’—Colleen Crim

‘Being someone diagnosed as a terminal cancer patient, I have scoured the ‘net and read many books. This is the best. And it gives hope too …. Get this book; read it; be inspired by it.’—Ian Clements, cancer survivor

Now also out in one volume as The Cancer Survivor’s Bible

Posted in Cancer Recovery Guides | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Healing: The Gerson Way

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on June 5, 2008


Healing: The Gerson Way.

Charlotte Gerson (with Beata Bishop)

 

The Gerson Diet is the definitive anti-cancer diet and this book is a robust – and very clear – restatement of its basic principles. What was a surprise to me was how many other ailments were benefited by the same diet – asthma, blood pressure, arthritis, diabetes, lupus, migraines and indeed almost every other systemic condition (but not those like Parkinson’s which affect the nervous system) – because the diet does not ‘attack’ cancer specifically. Instead it rebuilds the fundamental health of the body. There are case histories here of recovery from even the most terminal of cancers – pancreatic cancer included. I would recommend this book to anyone seeking to regain full and vital health.

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »