Cancerfighter’s Weblog

Alternative cancer therapies and ideas

Posts Tagged ‘scientific research’

OCCAM research on vitamin D – pathetic

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on September 4, 2012

OCCAM  – the National Cancer Institute’s Office for Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine – really doesn’t want to know the truth. In it’s 2010 Annual Report it discusses a study into whether Vitamin D could be preventative for lung cancer. Describing the study they reported: “The patients in the pilot study will receive 45 micrograms of calcitriol [considered by them to be the active form of vitamin D] every other week for 3 months.”  Now, compare this with what the vitamin D Council says on their website at : “Studies show large quantities of vitamin D3, also known as cholecalciferol, are synthesized in the skin in response to full-body summer sun exposure – about 10,000 international units (IU).1 nBecause this happens within minutes, overexposure is not necessary. In fact, one will have made all the vitamin D they are going to make for the day in about one-half the time it takes for their skin to turn pink.”

Now the conversion rate is 40 international units per microgram – so 10,000 units is 250 micrograms.  On a hot day you will get this effect from say 15-20 minutes in the sun full body exposure. One key question then is how are they going to regulate or monitor the amount of sunlight exposure their experimental group gets.

So: OCCAM are planning to test wholly inadequate levels of Vitamin D. This is one way to get the negative results that they want.

Note: The second possible issue is which form of vitamin D they use. Cholecalciferol and Calcitriol are not identical – and if you go to the following research summary:  you will find a comparison of their effects in a particular study. In truth there does not appear to be much difference between them. Though it would seem that cholecalciferol is marginally more effective (a lower quantity is needed to get the same results)

This is just crazy science.  I personally take 5-10,000 iu of vitamin D a day as a supplement and have done for well over a year. I feel good and last winter did not have the winter blues that I am prone to.

Jonathan Chamberlain is author of The Cancer Survivor’s Bible

“An inspirational guide”


Posted in cancer suppplements | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Corrupt practi9ces at the FDA

Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on August 13, 2012

Many people believe ‘science’ is the only true validator of any new drug. But what happens if that science is corrupt? Well, then – or so you would think – the watchdogs at the FDA would uncover the fraud and then punish the originator of that fraud. Or would they? Perhaps they would just wave the fraud through. That is the claim of a former FDA drugs analyst.

Ronald Kavanagh was a drug reviewer for the FDA in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research from 1998 to 2008. In a recent interview he claims that the FDA bypassed or ignored safety issues on major drugs approved during his employment. In an interview  with Martha Rosenberg for the online news magazine Truth-Out he said:

There is … irrefutable evidence that managers at CDER have placed the nation at risk by corrupting the evaluation of drugs and by interfering with our ability to ensure the safety and efficacy of drugs. While I was at FDA, drug reviewers were clearly told not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve drugs. We were prevented, except in rare instances, from presenting findings at advisory committees.

In 2007, formal policies were instituted so that speaking in any way that could reflect poorly on the agency could result in termination. If we asked questions that could delay or prevent a drug’s approval – which of course was our job as drug reviewers – management would reprimand us, reassign us, hold secret meetings about us, and worse. Obviously in such an environment, people will self-censor.”

For the full story read:

Posted in Big Pharma Files | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »