Dr Ben Goldacre, homeopathy and the question of scientific evidence
Posted by Jonathan Chamberlain on July 30, 2010
Cancer: The Complete Recovery Guide – www.fightingcancer.com
Dr Ben Goldacre, a columnist of London’s Guardian newspaper, is a scourge of anyone who does not conduct impeccable science. He has often expressed himself contemptuously on the subject of homeopathy. Here is an exchange of emails I had with him a few months ago.
> Dear Dr Goldacre
> It is of course bad science to prefer theory to factual evidence. It’s no
> good saying X is impossible if in fact X happens. It’s also no good saying
> “We cannot accept it because we cannot understand how it can possible be” – not if X happens. That is the point of experiments.
> So I now point you to evidence that homoeopathy works and look forward to your discussion of this.
> A paper on homeopathy and cancer was published in the February 2010 issue of the International Journal of Oncology. Scientists at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDA), led by Moshe Frenkel, MD, have confirmed the ability of four homeopathic remedies to induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in breast cancer cell lines in the laboratory. The scientists in question were from the Integrative Medicine Program, the Department of Molecular Pathology, and the Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology of MDA.
> Their two Indian collaborators were from the Banerji Homeopathic Research
> Foundation, Kolkata, India, where these same remedies are employed
> clinically with apparent success. The four ultra-dilute remedies in question
> were Carcinosin, Phytolacca, Conium and Thuja.
> “The remedies exerted preferential cytotoxic effects against the two breast
> cancer cell lines, causing cell cycle delay/arrest and apoptosis” the
> authors wrote.
> Yours sincerely
> Jonathan Chamberlain
you do understand these arent people, these are cells in a dish?
It is evidence that even with cells in a dish a homoeopathic substance has an effect – ie placebo effect doesn’t come into it.
Dr Goldacre’s response:
can you think of any other explanations for the finding?
If lab tests have any validity at all it is that they indicate possibilities – in this case the possibility that 4 homoeopathic preparations might have a beneficial anti-cancer effect. Of course there are many possible events that might have affected the results – contamination for one. However, until these have been tested one at least has to recognise that there appears to be some sort of effect caused by homoeopathic preparations. Critics of homoeopathy argue that these preparations simply cannot possibly have any effect at all.
We can now say that these same critics – if they persist in arguing that there is no evidence – will be falsifying the record – that is they will be arguing ideologically rather than scientifically if they continue to say there is no evidence that homoeopathic preparations have any effect at all. This research shows that there is evidence. That evidence may be suspect or weak but it exists.
There was no further comment from Dr Goldacre